The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares the proportion of New Zealanders by age group from 1950 to 2050.
It is noticeable that while the rates of people aged over 65 and 25-37 decrease over the period shown, there is an overall increase in the figures for the other age groups. Also, the proportion of people aged over 65 in New Zealand is the highest in all the years.
In 1950, the percentage of people aged over 65 was 60%, more than double the figure for the 38-45 age group, at about 25%. Over the next 40 years, these figures followed a similar pattern, reaching peaks of 70% and under 50% respectively in 1990 before setting a downward trend until 2000. By 2050, the rate of the oldest people is predicted to fall to about 55% while the figure for the second oldest group is expected to remain unchanged at 40%.
Regarding the other categories, initiating at about 5% in 1950, the proportion of the youngest New Zealanders almost stabilized before doubling in 2000 and is predicted to reach 20% in 2050. By contrast, the figure for those aged 25-37 decreased by half to about 10% over the first 40-year period and is expected to keep falling to almost 0% in 2050.
- The following diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 73
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years 55
- The table below shows the number of visitors in the UK and their average spending from 2003 to 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows the process of making carbonated drinks Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54545454545 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35811881431 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7086736662 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106707427394 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683217159384 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805338279446 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10560014253 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916116189934 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.