The presented bar chart elucidates the cost of export products of one nation in numerous categories in the years 2015 and 2016 whereas the provided table delineates the proportion change in each export classification during the 2016 and 2015 comparison.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that petroleum was the products have the most income in both 2015 and 2016, compared to textiles which had the least earnings but the percentage value’s change increase considerably during the same period. Gems and jewellery were the only category have a decrease in per cent as opposed to the others.
At the start, petroleum products had the largest incomes when it contributed to over 60 billions, compared to textiles with just 25 billions. The number of earnings from engineered goods, gems and jewellery, and agricultural products during the same period was 57 billions, 43 billions, and over 30 billions respectively. The position of each export category’s income remained the same during 2016.
Despite the small number of earnings, textiles had a massive rise in proportion change in value by uptick 15,24% from 2015 to 2016. During the same period, goods from agricultural, engineered, and petroleum had also gone up by 0,81%, 8,5%, and 3% accordingly. By contrast, gems and jewellery were the only product that had a noticeable plummet by 5,18%.
- Differences between countries are becoming less evident Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 73
- The map shows changes between 1960 and now in Station Street 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, look, so, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27601809955 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86103841928 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561085972851 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5894919405 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.555555556 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284238979354 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123102553589 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130233185341 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195141912169 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120998433123 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.