Recently, youngsters in remote locations have limited access to education in developing nations. Whereas many individuals suppose that the issue can be measured by supplying more schools and teachers, others argue that technology is the master key to this problem. From my perspective, building more educational institutions and recruiting competent teachers would be a feasible solution for the following reasons.
On the one hand, providing the technology including computers and the Internet in rural regions is the major goal in dealing with the problem to some people. Apparently, learning computer skills permits juveniles from remote areas to compete with other contenders for suitable career pathways. It is mainly because a modern occupation requires each employee to be acquainted with some computer programs to be efficient at work. Additionally, the major benefit of E-learning is to enhance adolescents with the possibility of self-studying at home for not depending on teachers. When teenagers are learning through online classes, they will have to study by themselves without any guidance as none of the teachers are by their side.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that without dedicated tutors and quality schools, children would not be able to receive a well-rounded education. Doubtlessly, the learning environment is established by the connections and relationships between educators and pupils which online education simply cannot achieve. Good instructors seem to motivate students, stimulate their passion, and increase their self-esteem so that they can accomplish their academic goals. Furthermore, spending a prolonged period of time in front of computer screens may deprive the youth of essential human interaction and introduce children to completely uncontrolled contents in a hazardous environment.
To conclude, it is well-known that youngsters from remote communities have a lack of education in growing countries. Even though computers have supported some students in studying more efficiently than conventional techniques, I assume that teachers and schools still play an indispensable part in educational growth that cannot be demolished.
- we are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future is it good for us to reply so much on computers 89
- Some people think the news has no connection to people s lives so it is a waste of time to read the news in the newspaper and watch television news programmes To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The line graph illustrates population trends globally by percentage from 1950 to 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- Some people think the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment while others think that the main benefits are in the world business Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...c goals. Secondly, spending a prolonged period of time in front of computer screens may depriv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, whereas, as to, for instance, in addition, to sum up, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55693069307 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93860464591 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596534653465 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6156272685 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.058823529 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7647058824 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64705882353 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290342850374 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846053830249 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569098980286 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175247769628 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651895072319 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.