Reading is vital for people to gain knowledge. With life-changing rapidly nowadays, some individuals believe that people in the future will read fewer books than people do now, while others argue that people will read more books in the future. As for me, I believe that people in the future will read fewer books than they do now.
First of all, since the Internet keeps developing fast, it is likely to let people gain more knowledge via the Internet information instead of books in the future. Take my friend, Peter, for example; when the government built 4G Internet, Peter took online courses to learn extensive knowledge. It was so convenient that he watched a 20-minute video to learn all the concepts written in the history textbook. Additionally, he even promoted his novel learning habit to make more and more students learn efficiently. Thus, Internet development will keep changing students’ learning habits because it can allow students to acquire lots of information efficiently.
Secondly, the number of bookstores become fewer and fewer, thereby making people in the future have less opportunity to read books. For example, when many bookstores in Taiwan close, it is very hard for people or students to find a book to read. With this tendency, more and more people used other learning tools such as TV programs or tutoring to educate themselves. Even some people do not know where the bookstore is. Based on this situation, fewer people will utilize books to study and learn, thereby making people in the future more possible to read fewer books.
Last but not least, people place more and more emphasis on interacting with each other rather than obtaining knowledge, so they will read fewer books in the future. For instance, people nowadays like to hold the face to face meetings to learn from each other. They always exchange their perspectives or opinions in the international conference instead of reading books, making reading less valuable. Due to the obsolete knowledge and concepts in the books, not only the government but also the professors and scholars tend to interact directly to communicate and exchange their thoughts. Hence, it is obvious that people in the future will place less emphasis on reading the same amount of books as they do today.
In conclusion, I hold a profound conviction that people will read fewer books in the future. After all, the fewer bookstores, the more convenient Internet, and people’s less care about reading will allow people in the future to read fewer books than they do now.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in the future will read fewer books 73
- Agree or disagree students are more interested in politics than they were in the past 91
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should buy the products made in their own country 83
- the koalas population 81
- If you are a teacher and is going to do a project with two students which of the following method would you choose a instruct them separately and divide the projects into three parts so you only have to do your own part b finish all parts of the project w 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, after all, as for, even so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05200945626 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57004115233 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465721040189 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3775316646 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.85 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.15 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385850073583 0.236089414692 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153655247608 0.076458572812 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136250278274 0.0737576698707 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288697670947 0.150856017488 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145118685245 0.0645574589148 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.