The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000
The bar chart gives information about the number of passenger kilometers that people traveled by different methods of transport in 1990 and 2000.
Looking from an overall perspective, the figure of bicycle, motorbike, and the air was under 10 billion kilometers, whilst that of bus and train surpassed 40 billion kilometers.
It is readily apparent that the total kilometers jumped moderately by 16 billion throughout the time frame. Meanwhile, there was a correlation in the passenger kilometers traveled by bicycle and motorbikes. They had a trivial distance from each other, the former declined from 5 billion, and the latter from 7 billion, but both went down slightly in 2000.
On the other hand, the air's figure experience was opposite to that of the bicycle, when it climbed from 5 billion in 1990 to 7 billion in the last year of the survey. Moreover, the figure for bus and train, which touched roughly 42 and 40 billion in 1990, in turn, kept the first and second place respectively, converted their rank owing to the negligible rise of the former by 45 billion while the latter reached 46 billion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 84 | view |
- the graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group 1998 2000 78
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 50
- The chart shows the number of international students from four different countries applying for universities in a European country from the year 2004 to 2008 49
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8125 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67995954442 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4326949527 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169083079657 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101075247866 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153932817623 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11398746272 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16639829979 0.0819641961636 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.