The line chart shows the percentage of people living in Australia, born in Asia, UK and other regions
The line graph illustrated the proportion of residents in four regions: Australia, Asia, UK and others.
Overall, at the beginning the number of people living in Asia is the lowest, while the highest is in Australia. When it comes to 2011, UK accounted for the lowest, whereas Australia remained the same.
In 1976, residents in Asia amounted of more than 2.5% and substantially rose up to around 7.5% in 1996, before reaching the peak at 15% in 2011. In other areas, the rate of people began at about 12% in 1976, then went down to the lowest at nearly 8% in 1991, after that, this figure climbed up to 17% in 2006 and fell down in 2011 at the percentage of 12%.
About the other two countries, 13% was the beginning point of the proportion of people in UK, however, it took a dramatical decrease to 5% in the year of 2011. For Australia, 23% is the amount of people living there in 1976, which this trend dipped down to more than 20% in 2006, before peaking at 25%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-09 | Ester Nguyễn | 78 | view |
- The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 70
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should s
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 61
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should s
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Others believe that there are health benefits of living in the cities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46927374302 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40649226439 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564245810056 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2974395691 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243162130353 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12315324157 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618611523475 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166679670597 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543464160819 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.