Given are two maps delineating the transformations of the waterfront area of the town called Darwin during a period of 5 years,commencing from 2009 to 2014
It is perceptible that there were drastic modifications which occurred mostly in the south with the construction and replacement; however,there were also some parts of the area that stayed unchanged
In 2009, the town was covered mainly by two industrial areas which were then demolished to make room for the number of trees in the south and the swimming pool in the northwest. In the centre of the waterfront area, there was the construction of another three residential buildings along with the university building erected in the west of the area. Meanwhile, in the south, the new harbour was built which could be accessed from the main road through the new footpath running through the green area.
Regarding the main facilities in the upper part of the map, they experienced no change over the period. Along the road leading to the fishing area, there was the school, the lake and the convention, and it is of note that the fishing area together with two swimming pools nearby remained unchanged.
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019
- the bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world 73
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 56
- The chart shows the number of visitors to a local cinema according to age in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- It is often claimed that electronic devices will soon replace paper books Do you agree or disagree 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , commencing
...called Darwin during a period of 5 years,commencing from 2009 to 2014 It is perceptible ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...he construction and replacement; however,there were also some parts of the area that s...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98461538462 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85715131022 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 156.309180792 43.030603864 363% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 194.4 112.824112599 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.0 22.9334400587 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200564468911 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928269573229 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630605142481 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137637357584 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11111031474 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.5 11.4329268293 258% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 30.0 11.0658536585 271% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.