Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts in the work.
Do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, museums and art galleries occupy a pivotal role in society which brings an abundant source of knowledge from a wide array of time periods. It is thought by some people that these exhibition buildings should pay more attention to showcase their regional cultural values and histories instead of masterpieces from over the world. From my perspective, I completely contradict the statement and this essay will address the explanations for my views as follows.
To begin with, international work of art in local museums does a favor for the residents to broaden their horizon in distinct nations' history. The habitants who desire to discover artworks in other parts of the globe are not likely to go overseas to see great artifacts in person. Museums are a great opportunity for people of all ages to learn about other countries, which brings them a new vision from historical and cultural aspects. For instance, Vietnam Art Museum stores roughly 400 objects of foreign countries; Vietnamese people, therefore, can pay a visit to contemplate them.
In addition, exhibiting foreign pieces of art seemingly is an excellent manner to attract local tourists and might increase the number of visitors. Museums normally expose their own artworks. In the long run, visitors will become weary since they may have seen all the pieces on display. If great overseas masterpieces of top-notch artists such as Leonardo da Vinci are exhibited in domestic art galleries, they will pique the interest of everyone, particularly art aficionados. They can witness incredible artwork that was previously accessible via the internet. Therefore, the number of visitors will increase as a result, and the exhibition buildings will flourish to become a popular destination for tourists.
To sum up, national artifacts and artworks, as well as foreign collections, make museums and art galleries more diverse and efficient for exchanging cultural aspects.
- Task 1 The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 93
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 3
- Some people think that childcare centers provide the best services for children of preschool age Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better carers for their kids Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ts to broaden their horizon in distinct nations history. The habitants who desire to di...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, therefore, well, as for, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31935483871 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85436482307 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606451612903 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6623927382 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.785714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174097271314 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565432813584 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507816541488 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100125121454 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377062754726 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.