Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts in the work. Do you agree or disagree?
The growing concerns regarding whether or not museums and art galleries should prioritize works that depict the history and culture of the host country over those from other regions of the world. From my perspective, I do not completely assent to this outlook because of a couple of rational reasons below.
On the one hand, museums and art galleries not only assist the preservation of traditional culture and customs but also contribute to honoring the historical values of the nation. First, these places aid in retaining traditional culture. With the rapid development of modern society, while urbanization has gradually removed the monuments which contain historical validity, the exhibit of local masterpieces is the ideal manner for sustaining the traditional qualities. Thus, people easily access these values. In addition, museums and art galleries are locations where domestic history and culture are honored. People will obtain a better awareness of their country by visiting these museums and galleries, as well as the country's golden eras and dark periods. As a result, the displays serve an educational purpose by instilling patriotism and promoting a sense of national pride among the people.
On the other hand, the display of international works plays an important role in promoting the economy through tourism and enriching people's weltanschauung. The objects of art from other parts of the world, especially masterpieces of famous artists are the most effective decoys for attracting tourists to the countries that own them. Take the Louvre museum as an example, one of the destinations not to be missed when visiting France, it owns a vast array of human art assets including over a million pieces. The representative works in this museum are Venus de Milo and Monalisa. This is the reason why more than 10 million tourists come here every year. Besides, the international artworks bring numerous knowledge and human civilization. People have a chance to meet insight into other cultures; hence, their world-views are broadened. People will have a new outlook from art aspects, which makes them more professional and knowledgeable.
In conclusion, museums and galleries' eventual purpose is to promote knowledge of all types; nevertheless, museums and art galleries should balance and make reasonable adjustments.
- The chart below shows the annual number of rental and sales in various formats of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Young people today spend too much money and time following fashion trends clothing tech To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Schools are the only place to receive true education Do you agree or disagree 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The growing concerns regarding whether or not museums and art galleries should priori...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, look, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42307692308 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93867707791 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590659340659 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5729358154 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298757013672 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794980222963 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809741421272 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177760514658 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480479086502 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The growing concerns regarding whether or not museums and art galleries should priori...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, look, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42307692308 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93867707791 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590659340659 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5729358154 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298757013672 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794980222963 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809741421272 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177760514658 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480479086502 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.