Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts in the work. Do you agree or disagree?
Since the prehistoric time to date, the exhibition of artifacts and artworks in museums and art galleries facilitates humans to unveil and decipher a myriad of historical facts. It is indisputable that national or world histories are two separated but interrelated areas; however, recently there is an emerging idea regarding whether art institutions should only exhibit works presenting domestic historical issues. I, as a far-left supporter, assert that it will be a shame if this viewpoint is seriously applied into reality due to some rational reasons.
On the one hand, people lean on the idea that there is no border in history so that laterally presenting domestic rather and international historical artworks is acceptable. In terms of history, a past event eventuating might have a strong involvement of several countries around the world; therefore, to fully understand and impartially evaluate a problem, further digging into world history is required. Additionally, art galleries and museums are where those who desire intensive knowledge come first to search for necessary information. This proves the correctness of the statement that not only works demonstrating national history but also worldwide historical arts must be exhibited in these places.
When it comes to the cultural aspect, its diversity is highly appreciated for thousands of years in which people praise and contemplate the difference among countries. With the advanced development of technology, distinct cultural information is overwhelmingly spreading on the internet, it, however, is not enough. To satisfy human curiosity, people hope to touch, feel and experience the culture as much as possible. That is why international culture also needs to be appeared in both museums and art galleries. Children, for example, ask to be taken to museums just to see how an Egyptian’s mummy looks like.
In conclusion, to form well-rounded perspectives and satisfy humans’ desire for real experience, museums and art galleries have to displace both local and international artworks.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 3
- Task Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world Do you agree or disagree 80
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55555555556 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15138173713 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4113392871 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.615384615 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189129890321 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595830781148 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404316067215 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105913470447 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342092099629 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.