Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts in the work. Do you agree or disagree?
Since prehistoric time to date, the exhibition of artifacts and artworks in museums and art galleries facilitates humans to unveil and decipher a myriad of historical facts. It is undisputable that national or world histories are two separated but interrelated areas; however, recently there is an emerging idea regarding whether art institution should only exhibit works presenting domestic historical issues. I, as a far left supporter, assert that it will be a shame if this viewpoint is seriously applied into reality due to some rational reasons.
On the one hand, people lean on the idea that there is no border in history so that laterally presenting domestic rather and international historical artworks is acceptable. In terms of history, a past event eventuating might have a strong involvement of several countries around the world; therefore, to fully understand and impartially evaluate a problem, further digging into world history is required. Additionally, art galleries and museums are where those who desire for intensive knowledge come first to search for necessary information. This proves for the correctness of the statement that not only works demonstrating national history but also worldwide historical arts must be exhibited in these places.
When it comes to culture aspect, its diversity is highly appreciated for thousands of year in which people praise and contemplate the difference among countries. With the advanced development of technology, distinct cultural information is overwhelmingly spreading on the internet, it, however, is not enough. To satisfy human’s curiosity, people hope to touch, feel and experience culture as much as possible. That is why international culture also needs to be appeared in both museums and art galleries. Children, for example, ask to be taken to museums just to see how an Egyptian’s mummy looks like.
In conclusion, to form well-rounded perspectives and satisfy humans’ desire for real experience, museums and art galleries have to displace both local and international artworks.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 30
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 84
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 56
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and re
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55238095238 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14845421126 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622222222222 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9898845953 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.538461538 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1839639788 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587573309418 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039724769251 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104144155759 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319666568499 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.