The chart illustrates the number of thefts per thousand vehicles in four nations Great Britain, Sweden, France and Canada in over the period of 10 years, starting in 1990.
Looking in the line chart it's immediately obvious that the figure for thefts in most of countries experienced a downward trend, while exception with Sweden. Although the theft in Great Britain was the similar in term of general decline, the proportion of theft in Great Britain always accounted for a highest number than those in three remain countries between 1990 and 1999.
In 1990, the thefts in France, Canada and Sweden stood at around 6000 vehicles, 7000 vehicles and 8000 vehicles, respectively. During the period 1990-1999, after the minor fluctuations, the thefts in France and Canada decreased slightly to just under 6000 vehicles. By contrast, the theft in Sweden had the trend to increased significantly approximate 12000 vehicles in 1999.
Over the same period, the theft in Great Britain registered as number 18000 vehicles in 1990. After that, it had a slight fluctuation and dropped on a dip about 17000 vehicles on 1999.
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 73
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the countries') or simply say ''most countries''.
Suggestion: most of the countries; most countries
...y obvious that the figure for thefts in most of countries experienced a downward trend, while exc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 299, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...t in Great Britain always accounted for a highest number than those in three rema...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14835164835 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63890179447 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5059794969 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225977716058 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105146272576 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298388877145 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144555963433 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162001250425 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.