Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
Past repeat itself and it needs to be taken more seriosly as compared to how it is currently handled by most leaders today. I disagree that past is of little use for the people in current leadership positions, because of three major reasons as discussed below.
To begin, incidents that occur in the past repeat over a period of time. Numerous studies have been conducted for studying this phenomenon that a is based on that fact that a global slowdown enters the economy over a period of every 20 years and also the challenges that have been faced by previous governments have repeated over an interval of time. For instance, in 2008 a global slow down was predicted by the experts which governments intially ingnored as a mere speculation. This has led to loss of jobs and homelessness in all of the united states. Hence, if governememnt would have looked back into the past and took researcher's warning more seriosly then better steps would have been taken to ensure job security in the country dueing these diffucult times.
Further, it is important to learn from the mistakes in the past to prevent yourself from making the same mistakes again in the future. Same rule applies to people in the leadership positions as well. For example, there have been several pandemics in the past among which the most memorable one is teh Spanish flue from 1920s. This data from the past regarding how the pandemics occured and handeled globaly by the governments provides valuable insights to the leaders of today to take better measure and create policies that can improve the results this time as compared to the damage caused by such spread of diseases. This instance provides a solution to the problems that many governments faced intially when Covid-19 striked globaly and most of the leaders were not able to create a pkan in time. If they would have better looked into the past scenarios of Spanish fleu then these measures would have been implemented sooner and more effectively.
Lastly, it is obsered that leaders forget challenging times over a course of good economic and infrastructural growth. But this does not mean these problems can not occur again. Study conducted by harvard university suggests that people seem to forget the bad and painfull quickly in the woke of good times. For instance, if a a comapny is moving towards growth and making good financial gains, it is easy for its leaders to get carried away and forget their competitiors. Therefore, it is important for them to look back into the past and make startegies of how they can continuosly grow overcomming the challenges similar to the ones faced intially.
Some may argue that leaders today should look towards creating a better present and future regardless of what happended in the past. But is this not that exactly why they should look what went wrong in the past to prevent that from happening in the future and create a safer environment today. Hence, people specially leaders should keep a contast eye on the past as well as future and ignoring one can be damaging.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-31 | rahatumar9072 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Ruhani | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | prathiba_n | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | jayauen | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-08 | Shubhan Mital | 58 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 53
- A person should never make an important decision alone 70
- Life today is easier nd more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 73
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men an 58
- A person should never make an important decision alone 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ts that occur in the past repeat over a period of time. Numerous studies have been conducted f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ucted for studying this phenomenon that a is based on that fact that a global slo...
^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...led to loss of jobs and homelessness in all of the united states. Hence, if governememnt w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had looked'?
Suggestion: had looked
...e united states. Hence, if governememnt would have looked back into the past and took researchers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: a
...he woke of good times. For instance, if a a comapny is moving towards growth and ma...
^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he woke of good times. For instance, if a a comapny is moving towards growth and ...
^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: a; a
...he woke of good times. For instance, if a a comapny is moving towards growth and ma...
^^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...to the ones faced intially. Some may argue that leaders today should look towards ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, look, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2539.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85468451243 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53307620011 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481835564054 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 786.6 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3837208657 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.904761905 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9047619048 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139968178516 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047664588364 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688734888303 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974675092483 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957585744866 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.