The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The first line chart shows the average expenditure on children's sport by parents every month. While the second one illustrates the proportion of children taking part in various sports in Britain from 2008 to 2014.
Overall, the amount of money spent on their off's sport showed an upward trend and more children join in sports.
Looking at the first chart, at the beginning of the period, only 20 pounds were spent on sports for children. In the next six years, the figure soared and peaked at over 30 pounds.
Turning to the second chart, in 2008, over 7,5 million children participated in football, tripling the figure for athletics, at approximately 2,5 million. The least popular kind of sport is swimming, with below 1 million children. Over the next 6-year-period, the number of children who played football was stable before rising slightly to about 9 million in 2014. The same pattern can be seen in athletics, in which the number surged to nearly 5 million after remaining unchanged in the first two years. Meanwhile, more children took part in swimming, with an about 1 million increase.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-31 | my220904 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | khangoccho | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-13 | felixchen | view |
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The advantages and disavantages of online learning 73
- Many people are working longer hours Why is this happening What problems can this cause to people 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...childrens sport by parents every month. While the second one illustrates the proporti...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, second, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98918918919 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56443051601 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610810810811 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0525414703 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439399655914 0.215688989381 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166407290722 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079146953261 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252758578851 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676295215395 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.