The pie charts provided illustrate two major changes in the use of modes of transport to a certain university between 2004 and 2009.
The two pie charts reveal changes in the usage of transportation to travel to a particular university over the course of 5 years from 2004 to 2009. Overall, there was an upward trend in all categories except for car. Additionally, car and bus were the most significant mode of transport during these years surveyed.
It can be seen that the rate of people using bus increased by 13% to 46% in the last year, which possessed the highest value among all. Similarly, the proportion of those who traveled by bicycle experienced a nearly twofold growth, accounting for just 9% in 2004 then rose to 16% five years afterwards. This was followed by the figure for train and walking but at a slower pace, making up 3% and 4% in the first year then increased to only 4% and 6% in the last year respectively. By contrast, an only decline occurred in the usage of car with its percentage witnessed an approximately twofold decrease, accounting 51% in 2004 to 28% of the users.
- The pie charts above show the comparison of the proportion of energy produced by different sources in an European country in 1995 and 2005 80
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- FEWER YOUNG PEOPLE DO FARMING WORK IN RURAL AREAS WHY SHOULD YOUNG PEOPLE ENCOURAGED TO DO FARMING WORK 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, similarly, then, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63953488372 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79604623116 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656976744186 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3936587443 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152274146433 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747151457989 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115565108013 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145819915398 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106694748255 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.