The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart gives information about the variations in average house prices in five various cities in two different periods, 1990-1995 and 1996-2002, compared to the prices in 1989.
Overall, it is evident that the average prices of houses in New York and London fluctuated over the 12-year course.
To be explicit, the average money paid for a house in New York saw a fall to a negative 5% during the 1990-1995 period. However, it surprisingly grew to the exact figure in the positive direction over six years later. Similarly, the average expense for a residence in London and Tokyo hit the negative levels in the first space of five first years, at 8%. Nonetheless, in the subsequent given period, the prices in London rocketed up to around 12% positively, whereas, although increased, average house prices in London maintained at the negative figure (-5%).
In terms of Madrid and Frankfurt, they both shown positive proportions change in house prices compared to 1989, at 2% and 3% respectively in 1990-1995 period. Thereafter, in the 1996-2002 course, whilst the figure for Madrid's average house price proportion doubled to 4%, Frankfurt's witnessed a slight decrease to about 2%, the same number in Madrid's house expense during the last five years.
- The Internet is now used around the world as a source of information and communication However its content is often controversial so many people think its needs to be controlled Others believe there should be no interference whatsoever Discuss both views 90
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing What factors contribute to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers 89
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing What factors contribute to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nonetheless, similarly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14009661836 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69945016672 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545893719807 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3337836757 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370891893914 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169970200546 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133545261187 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263339705143 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132273816224 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.