Online shopping is increasing dramatically. How could this trend affect our environment and the kinks of jobs required?
In recent years, thanks to the advancement of the Internet, online shopping is gradually gaining much more popularity than usual. From my perspectives, this tendency has significant impacts on the environment and the employment as well.
The rapid growth of online shopping affects positively and negatively the environment. One clear benefit of this trend is that it can help to reduce the amount of private transport, especially in urban area. In the past, it would be hard and time-consuming as people had to go directly to stores selling things they wanted even if those stores were in faraway places. However, now, products to different customers can be grouped together and sent to each individuals conveniently and quickly regardless of geographical locations. It will lessen the amount of emissions of exhaust fume from private cars and motorbikes resulting in the fall of carbon footprint as well as solve the problem about the traffic jam in cities. Unfortunately, online shopping might increase the number of detrimental wastes. For example, bubble plastic rolls are commonly used to wrap products so that they will not be scratched or damaged severely which leads to the rise in the level of environmental pollutions such as soil pollution.
In terms of employment, online shopping can create new jobs in specific situations. For instance, on while buying things face-to-face might do potential harm due to the easier exposure to the virus during the COVID-19 pandemic, more enterprises choose to cut down their labor force, therefore there are an increasing number of workers quitting their jobs and staying at home. As a result, they may resort to several online shopping platforms such as Shopee and Tiki to maintain their income and earn their livings. This can easily allow various jobs related to it to appear like delivery drivers. Nevertheless, doing shopping on the Internet can be considered to be one of main causes to the reduction in the number of traditional retailers. More and more people decide to buy online products on the Internet, which means that their traditional retailers will probably lose their daily jobs and become unemployed. This will raise the unemployment rate and place a challenging burden on the government to tackle this issue.
In conclusion, online shopping is gradually dominating other form of shopping due to its convenience. In spite of the existence of harmful influences. I believe that drawbacks can be solved with appropriate policies from the government and online shopping can help clients gain more wonderful experiences from using.
- The table below gives information about the values of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 61
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfont area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concert between 2010 and 2015 73
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Internet can be considered to be one of main causes to the reduction in the numb...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2184.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 416.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89223353015 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584134615385 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5672834651 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.947368421 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8947368421 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73684210526 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204725119237 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678278919138 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545857763134 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122458213853 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181475070813 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.