Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Nowadays, parents can learn more from their children than their children can learn from their parents.
With the fast development of the society, children have more and more knowledge than children in the past fifty years. Some people think that children can learn more from their parents than their parents can learn from their children nowadays. However, from my point of view, I totally disagree with this statement considering the following reasons.
To begin with, the emerging technology like mobile phones and computers could be difficult for elder people to use. Nevertheless, children nowadays seem to be born with the ability of master in the use of these electronic devices. Facing with the problem of aging society in some communities, senior citizens of a country may have some challenge to fit in this society which depends on Internet and artificial intelligence a lot. Children’s grandparents may get confused in most the situations when it is time to use technology at home. This problem of technology shock could be solved by letting the youth to teach their parents about these. As a result, parents could learn more form their children than their children learn from their parents in the aspect of using technology nowadays.
In addition, children have the creativity and imagination that their parents do not have. In many fields, these two capabilities are considered as the necessary character. Scientists need creativity and imagination to conduct researches. Artists and designers also need both abilities to create fantastic artworks. The world of the children is not as complex as the adults. Their artless minds are the things that their parents should learn from. Therefore, parents should learn to be creative and imaginative as their children do.
In conclusion, based on the reasons that nowadays children are familiar with technology and they have more creativity and imagination than their parents, I extremely agree that parents can learn more from their children than their children can learn from their parents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-22 | LAPLACE DEMON | 60 | view |
| 2020-12-03 | nghivu | 40 | view |
| 2020-10-13 | 地狱博士后 | 76 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | huangningguo | 7 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | huangningguo | 52 | view |
- Imagine that you have been given the opportunity to advise the government of a city or region area that you are familiar with to spend more money on ONE thing to benefit the city or region Which ONE of these do you believe would be the most beneficial for 48
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Economy growth should not be slowed down by concerns about environment 68
- Government should not provide financial support to artists For example painters writer musicians and the government should let them support themselves 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Economy growth should not be slowed down by concerns about environment 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is a waste of money for governments to fund space travel or space exploration 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29581993569 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70906380231 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495176848875 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.742650788 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8823529412 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.676828031365 0.236089414692 287% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218717053179 0.076458572812 286% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.235269041529 0.0737576698707 319% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.501905740375 0.150856017488 333% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169451694546 0.0645574589148 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.