Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Can two people be good friends if one person has more money than the other?
One of the most integral needs of humans is being in a relation with others, since friends compose the most part of our relations, it is important to have good friends. While some people believe that different folks could make a good friendship even they are worlds apart from wealth aspects, others think that they are not able to maintain a long-lasting and stable relationship with these people. From my point of view, I think it is hard for people to have a firm connection of different financial background.
To begin with, wealthy people have some specific behaviors that are not suitable to become friends. To be more specific, wealthy people are more arrogant at dealing with problems that others have. When someone is asking them for help, most of them will think that helping them are not their obligations. Take one of my classmates, Johnson as a good example. He was born in an aristocratic family and always like to show off his wealth among my classmates, such as his luxurious bags, perfume, neckless and cars. He does everything without considering others emotion. As time went by, his bad habits hurt his friend one by one and no one would like to make friends with him in the end.
In addition, folks become best friend not because of their wealth, but because of their common interest and outstanding and attractive personalities. Common interest and attitudes join friends strongly. As the old saying goes,“Birds of a feather flock together.” For instance, my friends and I both are interested in swimming. We always go out for a swim in the river or the swimming pool after class or at weekends, teaching each other how to swim fast and chasing in water. Through the hobby of swimming, we are brought together and spend lots of time having fun. However, spending time on showing off how wealthy they are could only estrange one another. Money and luxuries are just acting as walls and boundaries between people.
In a nutshell, based on the reasons that people make friends and get alone well with each other because they have attractive personalities and wealthy people have bad habits and behaviors that people hate, I strongly agree that people are not able to make friends with those who have different financial backgrounds with them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-23 | LAPLACE DEMON | 91 | view |
- When you give money to the charitable organizations would you prefer to choose how the donation will be used for example donate money on food service or advertisement for organizations or leave the decision to the organizations 76
- Teachers are making efforts to enhance students interest in study Which way do you think is the most effective way 1 Applying technology in their teaching such as computers or other mobile devices 2 Encouraging students to study in groups 3 Introducing ho 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Government should not provide financial support to artists For example painters writer musicians and the government should let them support themselves 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children should spend most of their time studying or playing they should not be required to help the family with household chores such as cooking etc 94
- When you give money to the charitable organizations would you prefer to choose how the donation will be used for example donate money on food service or advertisement for organizations or leave the decision to the organizations 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, while, apart from, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8811369509 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58833483052 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6802016508 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.944444444 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246355766556 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709527621767 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067079554118 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155471676658 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551740841108 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.