Most countries seem to have indulged in accelerating their economy under the fierce global competition. What we never imagine is that it is the nature that finally pays the price sometimes worsen than the prediction. To be sustainable for future, we human beings should not sacrifice the environment for private profit.
The first thing should be emphasized is the irreversibility of ecosystem. With such a large diversity of animals and plants, the system is fragile and vulnerable, which means any effect imposed to it will be too detrimental to bear. Now, let’s turn to what human beings have done. We pour the sewage to the river where fishes and aquatic plants lived; we emit the waste gas to the air which we need to breath in everyday; we invade the remote area that used to be wild animals’ habitats. All of these only orient to human being’s profit without any consideration for the potential risks. Well, to be more precise, it has turned into the actual life threats for every aspect of the living environment. The whole world has been trapped by deteriorated surrounding; not only are animals suffering from the continuous extinction, but also human beings are struggling with the environment-related diseases. Isn’t it horrible? We, finally, become the one to swallow the bitter pill.
Also, prospering the economy never has an end. Some opponents take inferior situation of the country as an excuse for restless exploiting where we live. However, how to define the success of being developed? For example, China used to be a country with extremely low productivity. In order not to be lagged behind, we spared no effort to dig our land for available resource and thus the last generation has already been surrounded by poor environment. Today, after narrowing the gap with other developed countries, our government is planning the further goal. There is no denying that the heavily damaged would still be depended on for generating more for the sake of human’s endless desire.
In a nutshell, I am not declaring that the environment and economic development cannot coexist but the degree should be carefully concerned.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is a waste of money for governments to fund space travel or space exploration 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Government should not provide financial support to artists For example painters writer musicians and the government should let them support themselves 83
- Teachers are making efforts to enhance students interest in study Which way do you think is the most effective way 1 Applying technology in their teaching such as computers or other mobile devices 2 Encouraging students to study in groups 3 Introducing ho 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Economy growth should not be slowed down by concerns about environment 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more obsessed with buying material things like expensive clothes and cars because people judge each other according to their possessions Agree or disagree 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 412, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...s to the air which we need to breath in everyday; we invade the remote area that used to...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, still, thus, well, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07932011331 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87148178387 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626062322946 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9219390649 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.65 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150209255138 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494039692097 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04002485595 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105011553676 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130189555236 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.