To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
A public official is an important individual as it is his duty to come up with solutions to the problems raised by the public. The prompt recommends that in order for a bureaucrat to be efficacious, they must adhere to the pinnacle of moral principles and ethicality. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this suggestion and believe that righteousness is linked with efficiency for two reasons.
Firstly, a public official officer must maintain a positive image in public as having a negative one could affect his ability of being an effective leader. For example, when a politician’s career is filled with controversies and flaws, it leads to his team wasting their time on finding excuses and trying to justify his behaviour. As a result, they aren’t able to devote their time to issues that are actually of utmost importance which leads to the politician’s success being compromised. Moreover, if one’s behaviour is unethical, it will most probably evoke a negative response from the public which would not only harm the individual’s reputation but also the party they represent as their value would decrease.
Finally, if a public official lacks ethical and moral qualities, he loses the ability to be transparent with the public. As a result, it might be difficult for him to inspire people because their respect for him would most likely have diminished. Furthermore, not having a good reputation with the public would drastically hinder the chances of a leader to form any kind of association with the public. They would not want to vote for someone who has a bad image as it would harm their own reputation. In other words, no matter how powerful an individual is, if his character is stained, it would definitely reduce his efficiency.
Of course, some may argue that there are other factors that can contribute to the efficiency of an individual and not just their adherence to moral principles. However, I believe that political leaders need to be ethical in order to set a good example for the people who have put their trust in them as this would not only ensure efficiency but also minimize the rate of corruption in the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-31 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-10 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2022-08-28 | nipuntestbig | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-25 | ajay@123 | 62 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | idris oriyomi | 54 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, kind of, of course, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93131868132 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8583828142 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524725274725 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4347445918 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.214285714 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8571428571 5.21951772744 227% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219882674725 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084767813015 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682455793519 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139273371698 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398370127782 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.