Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study, or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you have never taken before? Why?
In the modern era, learning a topic is mostly related to the environment in which we study including the teacher and facilities we have access to. If we are previously know them we will learn better. In this regard people's opinions are divided as to whether knowing the teacher is useful or not. Despite the fact that new teachers offer new methods of learning about a topic, It is my firm conviction that it is better to know teacher beforehand. To support this, there are several reasons two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following.
First and foremost, the reason why previous teachers help us the most lies in the fact that we definitely should have better performance. In a class where we know our teacher we and when we encounter a problem we will easily solve it just because we have convivial relationship with our teacher. In fact, the friendly relationships help us to learn materials better and as a result we can boost our knowledge in an easier way. According to the statistics more than 70 percent of information we learn can be perceived better as we are familiar with environment in which we study which is directly related to teacher and facilities we use. If they had not known for us, we would not have learnt most of the knowledge conveyed by the professor. Schools are the places where students enlisting the helping hand of their teacher push back the frontiers of knowledge which is highly doable if we know the teacher beforehand. Therefore, our efficiency is higher when we know the teacher.
Another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that when we know the teacher we will have less stress level and tension. In a place where we know the teacher and where we are familiar with his or her styles of teaching our stress level will be diminished highly and consequently we can relieve our stress level and unwind. My personal experience is a compelling example, I remember when I was passing the mathematic 1 course in the college I felt It is not possible for me to pass the course and thus I was under great amount of tension, but when I had course with the same teacher in mathematics 2 I felt better because I knew the teacher and how he will behave in different situation. As an instant result of knowing the teacher I passed the course with high grade which made me satisfied with the course. If we know the teacher, our stress level will highly diminish.
In summary of what have been illustrated and discussed, it is a foregone conclusion that knowing the teacher will provide us with better atmosphere rather than we do not know him. The high efficiency coupled with lower levels of stress and tension, are the reasons which strengthen my claim.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...acher and facilities we have access to. If we are previously know them we will lea...
^^
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...we have access to. If we are previously know them we will learn better. In this rega...
^^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... are previously know them we will learn better. In this regard peoples opinions are di...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...his regard peoples opinions are divided as to whether knowing the teacher is useful or not. D...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 686, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... he will behave in different situation. As an instant result of knowing the teache...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as to, in fact, in summary, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2229.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 479.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65344467641 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60494113807 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44885177453 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 683.1 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.1226285516 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.315789474 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2105263158 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0746069099778 0.236089414692 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319988377701 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382699411873 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0571618272588 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028926209541 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.