Many modern children spend a great deal of time sitting in front of a television or computer screen. This is extremely harmful to their development. Therefore, parents should strictly limit the time that children spend in this way.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, with the developing technology, the youngsters are mostly dependent upon the high-tech devices such as television or computer. This habit is believed to make a considerable adverse impact on children's physical health as well mental one. Hence, adults especially their parents have to take responsibility for restrict the amount of time youngsters spend on these modern devices. Actually, from my perspective, I totally agree with this statement under any circumstances.
To begin with, it is undeniable that youngsters are easily addictive to high-tech devices which make children out of control. They are not mature enough to resist the temptation from these devices. They immerse themselves in a virtual world, which makes them have isolation from the real one. Some youngsters even skip their meal to finish watching their favorite movie or playing video games. This may lead to malnutrition and some other health problems. In addition, their relationship is also more narrow because they sit in front of the screen all the time instead of going out to integrate with modern society. Another negative point is that they may become couch potatoes and they would get accustomed to a sedentary lifestyle. In fact, youngsters should do some physical exercises to improve their health as well as their spirit instead of insisting on keeping this habit all the time. If you look at those who are addictive to these electronic gadgets, it is quite obvious that almost nobody can develop comprehensively.
With the ideas mentioned above, I stand on the opinion that parents should set a limit on the amount of time on which their children are allowed to use television and computer. Youngsters, with the supervision and guidance of their parents, would be able to explore and take part in outdoor activities like sports, which is beneficial to their physical health. Furthermore, by reducing the time spent on television and computer, children could allocate additional time focusing on academic studies and expanding social circles. This, in return, equips the young with skills that is necessary for the future and broaden their horizons.
In conclusion, the excessive use of high-tech devices such as television and computer brings about negative impacts on children. As such, limiting the time use can be seen as vital actions by the parents to cultivate their children’s well-rounded development.
- It is better for students to study from home rather than going to school Do you agree or disagree with this statement 22
- Many modern children spend a great deal of time sitting in front of a television or computer screen This is extremely harmful to their development Therefore parents should strictly limit the time that children spend in this way To what extent do you agree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 900, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... keeping this habit all the time. If you look at those who are addictive to these...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31331592689 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83006319386 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563968668407 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1202794159 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.105263158 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1578947368 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296424721929 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083483214609 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060763498482 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184793836561 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206122920192 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.