The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age groups in 2002. it includes those with a degree, those with a higher degree and those with other qualifications. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the income of worker in many ages who in 2002. It comprises of people who has bachelor’s degree, postgraduate diploma and other certificates.
Overall, it can be observed that all of the three lines witnessed a significant increase and peaked before slightly dropping, except that the wages of people who have first degree suddenly went up before they retired.
At the youngest age groups, new employees with first degree had the lowest income which stood at roughly 350, while the income of those with higher degree and other qualifications levelled off at 390 and 420 respectively. After experiencing an upward trend of the salary of 3 groups of workers, the income of graduates who have first degree and others peaked at age 36-40, which were approximately 700 and 820. From the group of age 41-45 to the end of working age, there was a gradual decline of the salary of those people. Whereas the salary of others and people with first degree stood at the same point which was 780, the wage of higher degree’s graduates suddenly reached a high of 790.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | uienteo26 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-04 | tramanh2107 | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-14 | Lê Nguyệt Minh | 84 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 72
- The chart below shows that Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarise information by selecting and reporting the m 89
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- in some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough what are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 63
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
... of worker in many ages who in 2002. It comprises of people who has bachelor’s degree, postg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: ''.
...in 2002. It comprises of people who has bachelor’s degree, postgraduate diploma and othe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 34, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ates. Overall, it can be observed that all of the three lines witnessed a significant inc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tood at roughly 350, while the income of those with higher degree and other quali...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85483870968 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62037627735 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4859791078 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275687920279 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120554426924 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797214002018 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134878905879 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117712483465 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
... of worker in many ages who in 2002. It comprises of people who has bachelor’s degree, postg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: ''.
...in 2002. It comprises of people who has bachelor’s degree, postgraduate diploma and othe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 34, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ates. Overall, it can be observed that all of the three lines witnessed a significant inc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tood at roughly 350, while the income of those with higher degree and other quali...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85483870968 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62037627735 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4859791078 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275687920279 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120554426924 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797214002018 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134878905879 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117712483465 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.