Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this world, everyone has a different ability to cope with work pressure. Some people are inclined towards the attitude that people should always work in a group, whereas others hold different perspectives. No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of doing assignments alone or together. I personally, though believe if students work as a team it will lead to success. In the following essay, I intend to put forth my points and reasons for support.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that working on a single project with the team is absolutely helpful. It is important as it makes the assignment easy when the thought of 5 or 8 people combine together leads to more creative ideas. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. I do remember when I was in university my pharmaceutics teacher assign a project by dividing us into random groups. In addition, our topic was arduous and to make a final report we all put together our notion to get first prize and fortunately we won. Therefore, this experience taught me that if the group is based on good companions it helps.
Secondly, in group work, students get a chance to learn about the leading ability or to supervise wisely. It is necessary because it is not possible for everyone to do whatever they want. The mistake of one person makes the whole group suffer. To exemplify, when was in high school the leader of our group guide us in a different direction. As she was stubborn did not listen to a single word from us and made decisions without asking us that what we think and how we want to do it. The project cost us 500 dollars. As a result, we not only lost money and time we got a big F in the final exam. Thus, this example illustrates that if the group must be lead by a good leader.
In light of the reasons mentioned, I strongly agree that learning together is more effective than learning alone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the class room do you agree or disagree give specific reason and support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents are the best teachers Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54929577465 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61758810863 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571830985915 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1119899675 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.75 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268058526375 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712032604914 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593720719516 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166147197505 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346759318963 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.