Schools should prepare students for university, rather than for work. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of preparing students for university by schools and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of agreeing with the statement are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that preparing for work can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, preparing students for university can provide society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of sophisticated schools, are considerable. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of knowledgeable students. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of appropriate work are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, preparing students for work can supply the community with negative impacts that are associated with the reality that the demerits of inexperienced students are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient schools. Hence, predicted outcomes of improper work are significant.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of preparing students for university by schools far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of efficient work prove the significance of a hard-working student, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-19 | mehrdad att | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | Alireza.r.m | 85 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
| 2021-06-25 | Behnaz fallah | 11 | view |
| 2020-12-19 | santhip123 | 77 | view |
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them Give your opinion and discuss your views 80
- What is your idea about lazy journalism that is commonplace in the digitalized world 77
- Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Agree or disagree 88
- Nowadays the mass media including TV radio and newspaper have become the essential part of our lives What is your opinion 88
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western countries According to you what solutions can be proposed by the government and individuals 49
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79653679654 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35802961374 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3593723089 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.727272727 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377485219637 0.242375264174 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122133788969 0.0925447433944 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790625304861 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220108944654 0.151781067708 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052597314877 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.