Solving conflicts arising between persons as well as groups of people is sometimes very much necessary.What would be the primary things to think about when solving disagreements among people? Use specificreasons and examples to support your answer
Having a disagreement among people is not too strange in our life and work. We sometimes have a few conflicts when the opinions do not the same thing that each person thinks. So, solving the problems in our lives is very necessary. In my viewpoint, in a conflict, we should listen to the opinions of others carefully and everyone also should discuss this problem to find out the address method.
Initially, we had better listen to the thoughts, ideas of the others clearly, it results to that we can understand what things they would like to express. It is worthwhile for everybody to keep calm and listen to each other. In fact, it seems to me that if we listen and understand their thoughts, we might absorb many new things and have a variety of views. From this, the atmosphere in the conflict can reduce slowly when we know to hear.
Furthermore, people get together find out the solving ways is also a handling manner. We sit down and talk with each other, the more ideas we suggest, the more solving methods it helps that the problems are handled rapidly. The ideas are voted by many people, it shows that the opinions demonstrate to have persuasion for a vast majority of people. By the way, the conflicts are solved more easily and lightly.
Besides, learning respectfully and having tactful behaviors is also a way to solve the conflicts in our work and life with friends, relationships. When happening disagreement, we are likely to act thoughtlessly and violently, so if we can resist our disappropriate behaviors, the conflicts will not lead to regret consequences. Having a calm attitude and proper gestures is the lesson which we should learn about to help everything of conflict on control.
In conclusion, I think that in conflicts we had better listen to other opinions, discuss together problem, and keep appropriate behaviors with people. That it assists us to solve the disagreements if it happens.
- What qualities do you think are required to be successful 56
- Write a letter to your manager asking for a training course which you would like to attend letter explain What the course is Why it is required for your job How you will manage work while the course 78
- 2 11
- People have divided opinions on using computers Some say that computers have made their easy But others speak of the complication that computers have brought into their lives Which of these two opinions do you agree with 61
- 3 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, so, while, i think, in conclusion, in fact, by the way, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87537993921 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78861093031 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519756838906 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4565154188 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3529411765 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166402886989 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675229073028 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469626533537 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103629722612 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384540590907 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.