The bar chart below shows transport preferences among young people in four countries in a single year.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided chart gives information on young commuters’ transporting trend in so-called countries The UK, United States, France and Italy in a span of a year.
From a cursory glance, it is evident that in most of the countries, car was the highest choice except for France where bicycle was the leader. Italy has the most noticeable preference for car over motorcycle and bicycle.
A closer insight into the bar chart reveals that in car session, Italy was the leader with more than 70 votes, followed by The UK and United States at equally 60. Car was the least preferable choice in France with only 40 commuters’ choices. A quite different picture can be seen in bicycle session where it was the highest choice in France with over 45 people. While in the United States and Italy, only 10 and 12 voted for bicycle respectively, 30 people in The UK opted for this transportation.
Finally, when it comes to motorcycle, there are 30 people in United States chose this option, whereas in 3 other countries, the number hovered around 10 votes.
- The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nation Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- Imprisonment Statistics 11
- The bar graph below illustrates the statistics of imprisonment in five different countries from 1930 to 1980 78
- The bar chart below shows transport preferences among young people in four countries in a single year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83977900552 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66010481494 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591160220994 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.445868381 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10399611062 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488161982566 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048215998371 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0734070016684 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597051165124 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.