No matter what the situation, it is more harmful to compromise one's beliefs than to adhere to them
Life is full of situations that oblige us to choose between our beliefs or just ignore them. The statement claims that neglecting our beliefs is irriksome than sticking to them. By considering some exceptions, it is true and it's better for everyone to hold their beliefs.
The human's mental structure is required to have beliefs to be strong enough in various situations. Nonetheless, compromising one's beliefs, will endanger person's mental structure and would couse them to err in several ways. In Iran, there is no freadom for poeple to have religoin other than just a few ones accepted by the government. Therefore, Bahaiean people are not free to talk about their beliefs, especially in soceity. Their children do not have the right to get the admission of the university. If they choose to compromise their beliefs and hide them, they will be able to be accepted at the universities. However, it harms their mental structure because religion it required for religious person to strengthen thier characters, particularly in the difficult situations. Adhereing to beleifs will help people keep their mental structure tenatiously.
Opponents could say that in many situations it's better to get rid of the beliefs to stay safe. This has some merit in the surface. However, it should be considered that laking beliefs will consequently has
negative effects on person's life as becoming an immoral person. Hence, society will suffer from many damges such as immorality just becuase its citizens choose to be free of their beliefs.
In recap, it's better to keep our beliefs strongly rather than compromising them. It's essential for the mental health, and having a safer society in generral.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-15 | Mayuri Kale | 50 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage 73
- Claim Though often considered an objective pursuit learning about the historical past requires creativity Reason Because we can never know the past directly we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts documents and artifacts W 50
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s situations. Nonetheless, compromising ones beliefs, will endanger persons mental s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...d that laking beliefs will consequently has negative effects on persons life as be...
^^^
Line 4, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...l consequently has negative effects on persons life as becoming an immoral person. Hen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 275.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16363636364 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75980595797 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556363636364 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3450074328 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.5294117647 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1764705882 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213021427083 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681428545255 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678171310258 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113088377796 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620442962002 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.