Nowadays, more and more people engage in dangerous activities, such as skydiving and motorcycling. Are you in favour of such activities or not? Use examples to support your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of skydiving is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that motorcycling can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, dangerous activities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of being excited as well as adventuring are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered being favour of these activities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both young people and having fun apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, engaging in dangerous activities might increase the consequences of having a good time. Moreover, fundamental aspects of new experiences relate to this reality that the demerits of being in danger pertain to being safe. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of supporting these activities is correlated negatively with today's world. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this attitude.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the dangerous activities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the importance of safety prove the significance of the increase of these activities, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-12 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 88 | view |
- Animal rights are important Give your opinions 88
- Should marketing in companies which produce consumer goods like food and clothing place emphasis on reputation of the company or short term strategies like discount and special offers Why 85
- Schools should prepare students for university rather than for work To what extent do you agree with this statement 85
- The world s governments and organizations are facing a lot of issues Which do you think is the most pressing problem for the inhabitants on our planet and give the solution 88
- Taking part in sports is important for an adult s health and happiness To what extent do you agree with it 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62301587302 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22570722088 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634920634921 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9287590245 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.083333333 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1749176111 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552553692688 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404342003972 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958673112738 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305122874319 0.0609392437508 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.