The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graphs compare the shifts of percentages of households in using three different forms of electrical devices and depict figure for hours taken to do chores per week per household in one country over a period of 99 years (1920-2019).
Overall, the percentage of households who applied each kind of electrical utility almost increased; however, the number of hours spent doing chores declined during the period shown.
In 1920, 40 percent of households utilized washing machine, while vacuum cleaner was used by 30 percent of households. By contrast, the percentage of households applying refrigerator was negligible. In the same year, each household took average 50 hours each week to do housework. 40 years later, refrigerator overtook two other ones as the most prevailing electrical appliance, used by 90 percent of households. In addition, the number of hours of housework per week which each family spent fell considerably, by 30 hours.
From 1960 to 2019, the percentages of households running refrigerator and vacuum cleaner rose and reach two peaks of 100 percent in 1980 and 2000 respectively; then, those figures stayed unchanged during the rest of the period. There was a slight growth in the percentage of households using wasing machine, by only 35 percent. In addition, the households spent less time in doing chores, only 10 hours each week, in 2019.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | imurminhanh | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | ThHuong | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | ThHuong | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | nguyenhatrang | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
- The bar graph below shows the number of tourists visiting two different cities by season Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- The line graph below shows the number of single family homes constructed in the United States by region over a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows the number of single family homes constructed in the United States by region over a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22522522523 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84918366858 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8046593037 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172070776571 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076743263254 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449727958577 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118062160477 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226527255509 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.