Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on important subjects.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the modern learning environment, students can choose specific subjects to enhance their individual learning. Many people think that the science of food and its preparation should be part of the school curriculum, while others and I think that it is not necessary.
On the one hand, a certain amount of in-depth knowledge about food processing can have many benefits for your students in terms of improved well-being. It is a fact that many non-toxic ingredients can be harmful to people's health if they are cooked in a mixture. For example, under high temperature conditions, substances in various foods can react and then they are transformed into poisons that cause fatal consequences within minutes of ingestion, such as botulism, or that cause chronic diseases such as blood clots. The teaching of food science and food processing can help in such cases, so they should be included in the course plan to equip students with the necessary knowledge to avoid potential health risks.
On the other hand, other people and I are of the opinion that schools should teach students more important academic disciplines, particularly liberal and social sciences for the sake of their future. At first, the youth can acquire a wide range of skills which can be favorable for upper learning. Most prestigious universities accept students according to both high school academic results and on merits. At second, students would be likely to secure a good job at the workplace after graduation. Having a profound knowledge plus practical skills, they can easily attain a high-ranked position with a lucrative salary in a renowned company. Therefore, it is crucially important to place pragmatic subjects at the top priority for a solid foundation for learners’future prospect.
While it is a reasonable proposition to integrate food science, it is more important that core subjects be emphasized due to a positive future career outlook. Whenever possible, I believe that food science topics should be incorporated into the school curriculum as a complementary activity.
- It is widely known that despite cars damage the environment their manufacturer and their use continue to increase Why is the case How can this be controlled TRI HOMEWORK MAY 22 78
- Space exploration is a waste of money Do you agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs Therefore it is logical to share household task evenly between men and women To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 90
- The graph gives information about the number of people in Australia who used Chinese Arabic Italian or Greek as their first mother tongue Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that traditional culture is being damaged as it is used as a tool for making money in the tourism industry Others think it is the only way to protect culture and tradition Discuss both views and give your opinion 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'parted'?
Suggestion: parted
...e of food and its preparation should be part of the school curriculum, while others ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2696969697 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95989259726 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.552021874 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.214285714 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262758083321 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924223483074 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881648906552 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178814042843 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796784774585 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.