The graph illustrates the figures for science qualifications of Singapore and Malaysia. Generally, the number of Master’s degrees and Bachelor’s degrees are less than others and citizens of Singapore have higher education than people of Malaysia.
With Master level, the percentage of 2 countries is the same with approximately 3%. However, with a Bachelor's degree, Singapore has a higher figure for 20%, twice as much as Malaysia.
Turning to school leaving exams and no qualification in science, Malaysia’s statistics is higher than Singapore’s in both. With school leaving exams, the percentage of Malaysia is 35% while the number of Singapore is 30%, lower than Malaysia 5%. A similar trend can be seen in no qualification in science, the figure for Malaysia is 65% while the number for Singapore is 60%. Besides that, Singapore’s percentage of no qualification is twice as much as school leaving exams with 60% and 30%, Malaysia has the same trend, either.
The graph illustrates the figures for science qualifications of Singapore and Malaysia. Generally, the number of Master’s degrees and Bachelor’s degrees are less than others and citizens of Singapore have higher education than people of Malaysia.
With Master level, the percentage of 2 countries is the same with approximately 3%. However, with a Bachelor's degree, Singapore has a higher figure for 20%, twice as much as Malaysia.
Turning to school leaving exams and no qualification in science, Malaysia’s statistics is higher than Singapore’s in both. With school leaving exams, the percentage of Malaysia is 35% while the number of Singapore is 30%, lower than Malaysia 5%. A similar trend can be seen in no qualification in science, the figure for Malaysia is 65% while the number for Singapore is 60%. Besides that, Singapore’s percentage of no qualification is twice as much as school leaving exams with 60% and 30%, Malaysia has the same trend, either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-19 | xuanmai2501 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | xuanmai2501 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | xuanmai2501 | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | xuanmai2501 | 61 | view |
- With the development of science technology and business in this day and age it has become a core factor that makes people focus on it Therefore art has faded and is less attractive than before In this essay I will clarify reasons for it and give possible 73
- In the modern era A valuable discussion going on the society where some people demand to stop killing wild animals for testing drugs others have the opposite view In this essay I would shed light on both sides and justify my view On the one hand Individua 67
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows the various stages involved in the production of beer 89
- The line graph illustrates the figures for tourists that stopped by 4 different destinations in Brighton from 1980 to 2010 Generally it can be seen that the percentages of Pier and Pavilion increased significantly while the number of Art Gallery and Festi 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph illustrates the figures for science qualifications of Singapore ...
^^
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...el, the percentage of 2 countries is the same with approximately 3%. However, wit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32258064516 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11052056566 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496774193548 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9258240357 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.125 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.627250476741 0.215688989381 291% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.30508485792 0.103423049105 295% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188590259287 0.0843802449381 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.50059664563 0.15604864568 321% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.287546118868 0.0819641961636 351% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.