Standpoints diverge on whether humanitarian sacrifices in the animal research process can justify human’s indifference and brutality. Although benefits from animal testing should be taken into consideration, I vigorously oppose now that animal abuse for testing is ethically unacceptable.
Admittedly, there are myriad reasons why people support using the animal in medical research and other product testing. Perceptibly, animal experiments have contributed to the development of treatments and saving lives. Studies claim that almost any medical breakthrough in recent years has resulted directly from research using animals. Besides, animals are suitable subjects of investigation because their body structures are quite similar to humans’ in many ways. Therefore, these substitutes of animals reduce the risk of being affected by the product's side effects. Take gorillas as exemplary models for this issue, most vaccines are tested on them before being tested on humans due to the need for completion of medicine.
Conversely/By contrast, from an ethical point of view, experimenting on animals is considered cruel and inhumane. Animals used in research are often force-fed, living in conditions of lack of food and water along with being traumatized to study the healing process. As a result, these animals are particularly vulnerable to be mistreated and abused during the study. There was an article about the first cat to go to space, which showed that this cat returned safely. However, for scientific research purposes, she had to have a hole in her skull. The death of the cat is considered an inhumane death but is not popular in public. In addition, medicine and other products passing all of these animal tests does not signify that it is completely safe. Several studies have shown that unconsidered use can cause birth defects in humans, despite being tested on animals prior to widespread release.
By way of conclusion, notwithstanding the benefits animal testing brings to humans, I strongly suppose that it would be humane to stop abusing animals for any research aims.
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019 89
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019
- The use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries and shops To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- THE MAP BELOW SHOW THE CHANGES THAT TOOK PLACE IN THE TOWN AT THE SEASIDE RESORT OF BEACH BETWEEN 1950 AND 1990 78
- Question Some believe technology has made our lives too complex and the solution is to lead a simpler life without technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
... the need for completion of medicine. Conversely/By contrast, from an ethical point of v...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, first, however, if, so, therefore, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 965.302439024 184% => OK
No of words: 325.0 196.424390244 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45230769231 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90560608919 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 106.607317073 189% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621538461538 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 283.868780488 201% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.312600426 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.235294118 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336224021948 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106203116961 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704582996302 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205588087405 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554682136659 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 40.7170731707 265% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.