In terms of education, the question of whether schools should integrate a foreign language into the mandatory curriculum has been the subject of a heated debate. While some people propose the idea that students should not be forced to learn another language, I do not completely agree with them since I believe that the benefits of this policy are substantially more considerable.
On the one hand, it is true that the act of mandating pupils to learn a linguistic subject may be counteractive. The most compelling reason is that studying language is often a harsh and challenging process, which cannot be completed without sheer commitment and outstanding amount of effort. Meanwhile, students are already on the verge of exhaustion due to excessive work derived from other core academic subjects such as Math or Literature. Therefore, if schools try to add the teaching of another linguistic subject, the pupils may be too stressed to learn and end up studying ineffectively.
However, on the other hand, I would contend that the benefits of understanding another language for pupils is too remarkable to be skipped. In terms of in-class performance, bilingual students are able to read and absorb knowledge from reading materials written in not only the mother tongue, but also in the other language as well. Thanks to this ability, they can prepare for the lesson better than their monolingual peers. Furthermore, pupils who know more than one language will have a huge advantage in their careers after they graduate from the school. This is due to the fact that they are capable of working internationally instead of only in the boundary of their nation. Undoubtedly, these multilingual employees will get much better pay than the others.
To conclude, although the curriculum should be carefully constructed in order to avoid causing stress to students, I believe schools should definitely mandate students to learn another language because of the benefits mentioned above.
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 78
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast train between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport 78
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast train between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport 78
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In terms of education, the question of whether schools should integrate a foreign lang...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24764890282 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90850983279 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573667711599 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8309015307 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.769230769 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184066008247 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590668237636 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606737739442 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130184762995 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787727496769 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.