Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.

From a general point of view, nowadays, many technological developments have accelerated and facilized individuals' life and beneficiated them with many advantages. Internet is the hallmark of recent developments which has often provoked many discussions. Some people keep endorsing the fact that accessing internet should be free for everyone whereas others dismiss this claim. It is my firm conviction that governments should provide gratitude internet for all citizens. In what follows, I aptly elucidate on what rationales my perspective is based on.
To commerce, all services such as bank, educational, commercial services and so on have been performing online according to the governments decision. In other words, governments and the fast developing condition of the community has given rise to the virtually utterly online services. Therefore, since whole governmental institutions are operating through internet platforms and citizens require internet for even rudimentary tasks such as paying electricity bills, the government is responsible to provide internet at no cost, similar to other civil services. It is indisputable that citizens annually pay noticeable amount of tax which is contemplated for such civil services.
The second pivotal reason that bears in mind is that free access to internet directly contributes to the communities' literacy and knowledge level. To put in a vivid picture, people can have fast access to a wide variety of recent research about each subject coming to mind, the latest news and so on through a simple searching. Therefore, as soon as a question occupies one's mind, he can find the answer without demanding asking an expert or putting time aside to buy a pertinent book. Take my own experience as a compelling example. When I was student in a city other than my hometown, I was always in hurry to make a meal for myself. Since I had no experience of cooking, hardly could I cook without a solicitation of data or help. Therefore, I was thoroughly dependent on others to give me a hand or making a phone call to ask my mother the recipe. In fact, internet was the mere help for me which I could easily find various food recipes by it, even when there was no one around and I wanted a new and special meal. Maybe, I had never eluded to cooking and acquired this skill if it was not because of free accessible internet.
To put in a nutshell, there are persuading reasons to substantiate my viewpoint that government should provide free internet for citizens. This is because not only all the official and governmental tasks are dependent on internet and accomplished online, but also free internet access help to improve the communities' overall level of knowledge.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-23 Umme Abiha 70 view
2023-05-23 Umme Abiha 70 view
2023-04-22 Hossein2000 76 view
2023-04-22 Hossein2000 80 view
2023-04-22 Mitra-T 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user zahra.tmmm :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communities'' or 'community's'?
Suggestion: communities'; community's
...to internet directly contributes to the communities literacy and knowledge level. To put in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1040, Rule ID: ELUDED_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'alluded to'?
Suggestion: alluded to
...ew and special meal. Maybe, I had never eluded to cooking and acquired this skill if it w...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so, therefore, whereas, in fact, such as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2275.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12387387387 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96906906527 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556306306306 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7754805204 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282262408729 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803348276097 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695134927582 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181834827206 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522439895443 0.0645574589148 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.