The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000.
The line graph compares the amount of three main fuels produced (petroleum, coal, natural gas) in a European country between 1981 and 2000.
Overall, petroleum was the majority produced type of fuel, while natural gas production was lowest during the periods shown.
In 1981, nearly 100 tonnes of petroleum were produced. It increased steadily and reached 130 tonnes in 1983. This figure remained unchanged in the following 4 years. From 1987 to 1989, the amount of petroleum produced was decreased back to just under 100 tonnes. In 1995, petroleum manufactured was rose again and reached a peak at 132 tonnes.
Turning to coal and natural gas, we can see that coal was the second most-produced fuel in 1981. Coal remained stable until it dropped dramatically down to about 50 tonnes. It climbed back up to just over 70 tonnes in 1987 before slowly declining over the next 13 years to just under 40 tonnes. The production of natural gas remained unchanged at around 40 tonnes until 1994 when it began to rise. This figure increased double to 80 tonnes in 2000 and overtook coal as the second most manufactured fuel.
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010 100
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 78
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 84
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88947368421 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49902474052 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2074081007 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.4166666667 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.08333333333 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163895689172 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592915577759 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878516146925 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130227912121 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115934499349 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.