The given pie charts demonstrate three main sources of fish imported to the America from 1988 to 2000. At the meantime, the table describes the data about the total import index of fish to the US in 3 examined years.
Overall, there was a dramatic increase in the revenue of fish imported to the US over 12-year period. It can also be seen that China exported the lowest proportion of fish to the America between 1988 and 2000.
According to the data shown on the table, the import of fish to the US had a tendency to grow during the period of 12 years. To be more specific, in 1988, the total value of fish imported was only 6.57 billions of dollars, after 4 years, the figure experienced a slight rise at the threshold of 8.52 billions of dollars. At the end of the period, Americans consumed the amount of fish imported which was equivalent to 10.72 billions of dollars in terms of value.
Furthermore, the UK mainly imported fish from 3 different sources, namely China, Canada and the others. During the examined period, the percentage of fish imported from Canada tended to decline significantly, from 60% in 1988 to 34% in 1992 and eventually reached the lowest figure at 28% in 2000. In contrast, the amount of Chinese fish breaking into American market sharply rose in 3 years, at 13%, 20% and 30% respectively. Similarly, the remaining countries also exported soaring amount of fish to meet the demand of American people. At the beginning, the proportion of fish imported was only 27% of the total, but at the end of the period, this figure nearly twice as much as the data in 1988, reaching a peak at 42% of the total
- The chart below shows male and female fitness membership in Thailand between 1985 and 2015 84
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 89
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops 78
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '57 billion'.
Suggestion: 57 billion
...total value of fish imported was only 6.57 billions of dollars, after 4 years, the figure expe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '52 billion'.
Suggestion: 52 billion
...ced a slight rise at the threshold of 8.52 billions of dollars. At the end of the period, Amer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '72 billion'.
Suggestion: 72 billion
...ish imported which was equivalent to 10.72 billions of dollars in terms of value. Furthermore...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, similarly, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 33.7804878049 192% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 292.0 196.424390244 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58561643836 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52505506425 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482876712329 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5706128226 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.583333333 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342293360432 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136566358753 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864896914372 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25132616019 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120871132949 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.