Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another.
From a general point of view, people's life style has experienced changes drastically in this hectic world. This can be applied to the location that people prefer to live. Some people keep endorsing the fact that living in one place seems better than moving constantly to multiple places whereas others dismiss this claim. Personally, it is my firm conviction that living in one place is better than moving. In what follows, I will aptly elucidate what rationale my perspective is based on.
To commerce, people stablish emotional connections as well as professional ones in one place and forfeiting them and establishing new ones seems arduous. To put it in a vivid vision, once individuals resident in a place, they set on communicating with the nearby people and finding friends or creating cliques. Moreover, they start to work some where and gain work experience and enhance their situation after a while. It is crystal clear that moving to another city annihilate all these relations which often take time to be established. In fact, constant replacements uproot people from the whole deep ties that they have created and cut them off from their emotional and professional bonds, thus, put them some step behind from where they were.
The second pivotal reason that bears in mind is that habituating that is vital principal for human, is a time consuming, impressive and tiring process. To delineate, humans require to create the habit of associating with neighbors or shopping from a particular market by taking the familiar routs. Moving to another place make everything unfamiliar and impose the individual to put aside time and energy to create new habits. Let me provide my own experience as a compelling example to convey my connotation. When I was student in a university located in a city far from my hometown, everything was new and unprecedent to me at the first glance. I was accustomed to walk at nights with a friend when I lived in my hometown, and finding new friends and a convenient place to walk take a myriad of my time in addition to the unbearable feeling of being stranger and not knowing the places.
To put it in a nutshell, the aforementioned reasons clearly substantiate my perspective that it is better to live in one place instead of moving. This is because not only people will their strong emotional and professional ties which have been established through life span in their hometown will be broken, but also, since people have tendency to make habits intrinsically, it will be a time and energy consuming task for them to create new habits in the new place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 341, Rule ID: SOME_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'somewhere'?
Suggestion: somewhere
...g cliques. Moreover, they start to work some where and gain work experience and enhance th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: creating
...g process. To delineate, humans require to create the habit of associating with neighbors...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[4]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'accustomed to walking'.
Suggestion: accustomed to walking
...cedent to me at the first glance. I was accustomed to walk at nights with a friend when I lived in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, whereas, while, in addition, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90681818182 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78958270969 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520454545455 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7439729266 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.944444444 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232149814665 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799865566718 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762131677793 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145798978858 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572677717066 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.