The bar chart shows the percentage of small , medium, large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016
The bar chart reveals information on the proportion of corporations, namely small, medium and large, utilizing social networks for commercial purposes in the period of four years beginning in 2012.
From a prospective view, big businesses accounted for the highest percent of social media practices. In addition, both small and medium companies witnessed an upward trend while that of large corporation fluctuated wildly over the given period.
From a quick glance at the chart, in terms of the first three years of the depicted period, the percentage figure for small businesses climbed minimally to 30% in 2013, which was followed by a more significant growth in 2014. Medium companies followed the same pattern in use of social media but more aggressively from over 30% to slightly under 50%. The statistics of large businesses in 2013 were respectively a half and a third more than that of the small and medium ones; however, decreased slightly under 80%.
Moving on to analyse the remaining part of the chart, it is noteworthy that from 2014 to 2015, a sharp fall was recorded in social media presence of all categories. In contrast, there was a dramatic recovery encountered leading to the rocketing to around 50% in terms of small and medium businesses while that of huge companies returned to its original data in 2012.
- The charts below shows the percentage is of students joining north west University 84
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- how do you find about the party 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you thing laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, third, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05909090909 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75918825648 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572727272727 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2330775622 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.125 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400573697763 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156726167677 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463875642435 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227003245377 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333497913073 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.