Every interprise in the world is seeking prosperity and economical booming. However the main question remains, how? some belive external insight can shed the light to the success; however, Other think it is better to seek the answer from internal body of company. It seems that just looking to local human resoorces, is rather myopic. I will put this two contrasting view into comparision.
Employing Experts from outside of the company not only brings new perspective to the company's different issues, but also this brilliant idea of using fresh and unbiased views will help the manager to be introduced with new strategies. For example, last year my company was in economical crissis and it seemed to involved for my CEO and board that they came to conclusion to announce bankroupcy and close the company for good. Nevertheless, for final solution they ask the emplyee, whom thier job was on stake. One bright worker suggested to use an expert, and magically this reay do the job. Under the advice of the consuler, my company passed the dramatic turn and now our company is stable than ever.
On the contrary, Using the outside the company consultant may lead to superficial soloutions. Because a profound strategy to address the problemm needs a deep aeuentance withe the envoironment of company in its every layers. Even though this may be the case, This expersts always take their time and also investigate the complexities from eployees' outlook to reach a more complete view to give sugestions to takle the problems.
- You have just read an article in an international travel magazine which contained some information about your town that is incorrect Write a letter to the editor of the magazine In your lettercorrect the information in the articleexplain why it is import 89
- The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing.Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the sahara desert or the antarctic.What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places? 89
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...king prosperity and economical booming. However the main question remains, how? some be...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...However the main question remains, how? some belive external insight can shed the li...
^^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ant may lead to superficial soloutions. Because a profound strategy to address the prob...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 2235.4752809 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 254.0 442.535393258 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01181102362 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65982398841 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.665354330709 0.4932671777 135% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 704.065955056 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.4426082712 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9230769231 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228145769874 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635203002873 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680133977803 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130706575153 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925325198343 0.0667264976115 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.