The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart describes the percentage of worldwide land degradation in 4 causes and The table chart below compares the land degradation in three different countries in 1990.
Overall, Over-grazing and deforestation are two main reasons that cause a degree of land and Europe is the area that has the highest proportion of land degradation.
First of all, the downward of worldwide land by over-grazing and deforestation took up to 35% and 30% respectively then this figure was followed by over-cultivation, which stood for 28%. Moreover, others were just lower than 10% on causing land degradation.
Secondly, Europe's deforestation had the highest percentage at 9.8%, this number was followed by Oceania at 1.7% and 0.3 % in North America. Thirdly, only Oceania had 0% of over-cultivation while there was 7.7% in Europe and 3.3% in North America. However, the proportion of over-gazing in Oceania was the highest, which was about 11.3%. In addition, Europe's over-grazing was higher than the percentage in North America by 4%. Furthermore, it was clear that the total of degraded in Europe took first place with 23% and second place for Oceania, which according by 13% and third place for North America by 5%.
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 89
- some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Online shopping is replacing conventional shopping stores Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- Nowadays sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sports people and companies involved both financially and other ways Is this a positive or negative development for sports 73
- The graph shows the percentage of people who use mobile phones in four situations grouped into four age groups 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15228426396 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08235182386 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558375634518 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8782370192 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.777777778 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2222222222 5.23603664747 253% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102217779351 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512784123942 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784728060337 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106106510015 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888949143495 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.