The graph below gives information about household car ownership in Britain from 1990 to 2030.
The line graph given illustrates the number of cars per household in Britain over 40 years starting from 1990.
It is evident that one car and two or more cars ownership in Britain increased despite fluctuation, the opposite was true for no-car household. Also, no-car ownership experienced the biggest change in the period shown.
In 1990, the figure for no-car ownership was the highest in Britain with over 50% while the percentage of one-car and two-or-more-cars household was over 30% and 10% respectively. After 15 years, there was a significant decrease of 10% in the proportion of no-car ownership, while that of one-car household substantially increased by over 20%. At the same time, the percentage of two-or-more-cars ownership slightly declined after a small fluctuation.
In 2030, the one-car household is expected to be the least common type. In stark contrast, there was an upward trend in the number for one-car ownership, which is as similar as the estimated figure for two or more cars ownership.
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What are the solutions 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20606060606 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03421565589 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557575757576 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3601355576 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322076502778 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171890708528 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637216846578 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231372596948 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365034611511 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.