The charts below show the proportion of expenditure by students, on average, at one university, in 2000 and 2010.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The information about the proportion of expenditure by students, on average at university between 2000 and 2010 is illustrated in pie charts.
Overall, the figure for Students' expenditure for Food and drink in their home more dominant compared to others, and it still remained stable in the last period. In any case, other counterparts showed some changes.
In 2000, the proportion of spending food and drink for pupils in their home led the highest percentage with less than a third, followed by paying utilities. This contrasted with the figure for ones who spent money on vacations, using transportation, and eating out with just a very small percentage. Meanwhile, other expenditure figures showed just under a fifth.
By 2010, the expenditure for the students who eating out had an increase to almost one in ten, as well as of the figure for utilities and transport to just above 25% and just under 10%, respectively. Whereas the percentage of clothing had experienced a significant decrease to a minority, being the smallest. Nevertheless, the rest of the expenditure had no changes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-06 | chauanhyeudau | 73 | view |
- Children are suggested to study from Televisions However some people agree that other sources can be the best media for them to learn Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some companies a typical working week has been reduced to 30 hours Do the advantages outweigh the demerits 78
- The table below shows the estimated literacy rates by region and gender for 2000 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, still, third, well, whereas, while, as well as, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17415730337 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01212149481 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.4947309828 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175753994232 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762217122193 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832590979176 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130756475923 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982780517733 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.