School should not force children to learn a foreign language. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are arguments over whether school should make studying a second language compulsory to students or not. Although I believe that children should be free of choosing their own learning preferences, I also acknowledge that a required curriculum regarding foreign language has its own benefits.
On the one hand, students should not be forced to learn non-native languages for many reasons. Firstly, not all children are interested in foreign languages. With added responsibilities of studying a new subject, students may lose their motivation or confidence to learn effectively, ultimately leading to undesired overall academic performance. Secondly, learning a new language is not usually a top priority at school. As children are expected to spend more time on more important subjects like Math, Physics or Literature, school should also let children develop their nature talents instead of rather than compelling them to study languages.
On the other hand, acquiring a second language can certainly be useful in term of socialization and future employment. Through learning foreign languages, students can obtain more knowledge in their areas of interest, accessing to more diverse sources of knowledge. They can also gradually forming new relationships with people who share the same hobbies with them around the world. Besides, as the world is experiencing unprecedented level of globalization, cross-cultural communication is crucial to get a well-paid job and further promotion prospects. Employers will definitely look for applicants who are not only competent not only at specialized knowledge and exclusive skills but also at the flexibility of working with multi-national coworkers.
In conclusion, despite the aforementioned benefits of studying non-native languages, I believe that it is not essential to force children to study what they are not interest in.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting t 78
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 89
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 646, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...han compelling them to study languages. On the other hand, acquiring a second la...
^^^
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... working with multi-national coworkers. In conclusion, despite the aforementione...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67375886525 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21595038901 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606382978723 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1807438143 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.076923077 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237770395463 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882169349432 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656388907203 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152621785292 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814612429214 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.