Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well. Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Teachers are asserted to be in charge of teaching ethical lessons to students by some people, while others suppose that they should not be involved in anything more than academic education. Albeit imparting academic concepts is among the most seminal missions of educators, there is a need that they contribute to reinforcing the morality of students.
On the one hand, the opinion that the teacher had better teach only academic subjects is validly convincing. First and foremost, teachers are pedagogically accomplished and have a profound understanding of specialized knowledge. Therefore, focusing on teaching academic subjects not only intensifies the quality of their lectures but also allows them to take full advantage of their precious time. Second, moral lessons are deemed to be more influential and effective when being taught by students’ guardians. To elaborate, due to close relationships during upbringing, scholars have greater faith in parents, hence becoming more open to their advice regarding morality.
On the other hand, I advocate that educators should incorporate moral lessons into the school curriculum. First, teaching ethics at school helps stimulate the comprehensive development of students, thereby generating a solid foundation for their forward prospects. As an illustration, highly educated and well-mannered students may enjoy more occupational opportunities in the future. Besides, the implementation of ethical education can alleviate the incidence of various acute problems. For example, bullying may fail to emerge in the academic environment if all students are morally enlightened and behave properly.
To sum up, although imparting specialized knowledge is one of the most critical traits of teaching, contemporary academies should also attach special importance to ethical lessons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-04 | Trần Như Quỳnh | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-04 | Trần Như Quỳnh | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-01 | Đức An | 73 | view |
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Education 11 In some countries there has been an increase in the number of parents who are choosing to educate their children themselves at home instead of sending them to school Do advantages of home education outweigh disadvantages 63
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right or wrong so that they can behave well Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86194029851 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11908830449 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652985074627 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4762967655 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.846153846 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285042030894 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908821962169 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079452457291 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153732311059 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769801533203 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.