The table shows the number of international tourist arrivals (in thousands) in various countries in 2009 and 2010, together with the percentage change in these numbers.
The table compares the number and the percentage change of international visitors who travelled to nine different countries over a period from 2009 to 2010.
In general, most of the nations experienced an increase in the tourist arrivals after a year, except for Hong Kong. Germany had the largest change in overseas tourists among the given countries.
France ranked first in this term and the figure was unchanged at 76 thousand in both years. There were 66,000 international travellers who came to the USA in 2009, and the number increased 1,5% a year later. Both Spain and the United Kingdom received 55,000 sightseers in 2009, then raised slightly to 56,000 and 57,000 tourists respectively. Similarly, there was also a small increase in the figure for Italy which rose 2,3% compared to the previous year (44,000 visitors).
Despite having a much lower number of international tourists in 2009, Turkey and China became more attractive which increased by 33% and 55% respectively. Starting with 10,000 tourist arrivals, Germany’s figure climbed to 24,000 travellers, having the highest percentage change. In contrast, Hong Kong witnessed a slight decrease by 11%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-30 | Lê Thị Thanh Tâm | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | Lê Thị Thanh Tâm | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | Lê Thị Thanh Tâm | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | darciex_ng | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-04 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, similarly, so, then, as to, except for, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33870967742 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77478217478 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0840489296 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264909784435 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974461951367 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965528584054 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17638119567 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0992093470423 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.