The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple-producing countries in 2009 and 2019, and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019.
The given bar diagram illustrates the amount of pineapple exported by three countries who dominated the market. This study was conducted for a decade from 2009 to 2019. The pie chart, on the other hand, exhibits the underline percentages of cost to the consumer for every pineapple in 2019.
In case of export, country B dominated over rest of the countries which was accounted for over four metric tonnes in 2009. The other two countries amount was below two metric tonnes. In 2019, there was a dramatic change in export pattern. Country A became the major exporter, and the amount crossed ten metric tonnes. Country C exported the least amount throughout the period.
To breakdown the cost, distribution and retail accounted for the highest percentage, which was around 35%. Profit and taxes were other two major concerning areas of cost, while cost for obtaining licences and transportation remained almost similar. The growers were paid a lower amount of 5%, and the export cost was the least.
Overall, there were noticeable variations among the countries in exporting pineapple throughout the study period. The cost distribution also had significant differences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | Aashish Dhakal | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | folina | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | RTroMT | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | ThoiPhong | 87 | view |
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that the news channels and media nowadays have sensationalized and influenced people s lives in negative ways Others disagree and say that it is also positive 42
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24468085106 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70373967664 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547872340426 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9599337973 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8461538462 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4615384615 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297993219757 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10892741018 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076046853654 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192834748307 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109747505482 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.