Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Every individual has different acceptance levels about their current situations. Some people are of th opinion that, it is better to accept difficult circumstances while others advocate attempts to work hard and overcome such situations. In the scope of this essay, both the views will be thoroughly discussed. Personally, i side with the latter view.
On the one hand, people tend to find satisfaction in their bad situations, be it an economical crisis or an unsatisfactory profession. In fact, this is mainly because such individuals do not have any other option but to survive in these conditions. For instance, most university students face difficuly in finding a job which matches their university major and are often forced to work in unsatisfactory conditions and maybe get bullied at work. Nevertheless, these people accept these circumstances just for the sake of making money and survive in the world.
On the other hand, working hard to overpower such conditions can help to advance in professional career as well as to lead a successful life. In fact, there are many examples throughout history about people who became successful by conquering difficult circumstances. Take an example, Christiano Ronaldo was born to a financially backward family and had no money receive training for football or join a club. However, he took many parttime jobs later on his teenage years and worked hard. Finally, as a result of his constant struggle he was selected to the Portugal national football team.
To conculde, in my opinion , although it is common for people to accept their situations, in order to advance in career and succeed in life, they should overpower the obstacles and work hard.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-09 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
2024-01-23 | hau le | 78 | view |
2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 61 | view |
2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your opinion 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The value of money should be instilled into youngsters since childhood because social success is defined by the amount of money one has 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ll be thoroughly discussed. Personally, i side with the latter view. On the on...
^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ction in their bad situations, be it an economical crisis or an unsatisfactory profession....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ball team. To conculde, in my opinion , although it is common for people to acc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in fact, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18115942029 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96006426902 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626811594203 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7776047645 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.142857143 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221495668494 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704416372672 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540189790005 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129004965676 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602736935605 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ll be thoroughly discussed. Personally, i side with the latter view. On the on...
^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ction in their bad situations, be it an economical crisis or an unsatisfactory profession....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ball team. To conculde, in my opinion , although it is common for people to acc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in fact, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18115942029 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96006426902 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626811594203 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7776047645 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.142857143 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221495668494 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704416372672 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540189790005 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129004965676 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602736935605 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.