Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communications, such as letters, emails, or telephone calls.
Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Technological development has made the world easier to communicate with each other by many sources. Nevertheless, face-to-face communication is evaluated to be the best way to communicate by some individuals. From my perspective, I believe that each way to communicate has its own advantages.
First of all, by face-to-face communication, we can know the person’s attitude, facial expression, body language or voice tone. Scientists say that by these elements, we can know many things about a person such as his strong and weak sides, his traits, manners and we can also know that if the person is telling the truth or not. Besides, by communicating in person, the listeners will pay much attention to what you are saying and feedback instantly. For example, many managers prefer to have face-to-face conservation with their partners in order to see their behaves and through this, they can make the right decision for their future plans.
In addition, communicating by some virtual platforms also has its own benefits. The main reason is that communicating by emails or telephone calls is more convenient, especially in this covid pandemic time. There is not necessary to make an appointment with friends before meetings, all you need is just text or call them via their phone number anywhere and anytime. Moreover, in this covid pandemic time, the governments are implementing social distancing and as exemplary citizens, we have to obey this. Thus it is hard for everyone to make contact with others without emails or telephone calls.
In conclusion, it is inevitable that each way to communicate has its own benefits, depending on the situation to consider that which one is better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-15 | vucaominh19103 | 73 | view |
- Face to face communication is better than any other types of communications such as letters emails or telephone calls etc To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion above 73
- Face to face communication is better than other types of communications such as letters emails or telephone calls Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 507, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...emplary citizens, we have to obey this. Thus it is hard for everyone to make contact...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28467153285 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07186552832 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616788321168 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1387929371 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.384615385 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249872895595 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923043312366 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720520707369 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145992063422 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056310517983 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.